Dallas Justice
Dallas Justice – Toll Free number
Defense Home Dallas Justice – Firm Overview
State and Federal Appeal - defense lawyer, attorney and law firm – Dallas Justice
 
 
 

PRACTICE AREAS - APPEALS

 
 

 

Just because you have been tried and sentenced does not mean your case is over. The Law Offices of Michael Lowe also handles both state and federal appeals. In addition, Mr. Lowe handles state and federal writs of habeas corpus and new trial motions. Mr. Lowe has appealed numerous criminal cases in both state of Texas and federal 5 th Circuit ( Texas, Louisiana & Mississippi) courts of appeals. Whether it’s an 11.07 state writ of habeas corpus or a §2254 or §2255 federal writ of habeas corups, Michael Lowe stands ready to fight back.

Some of Mr. Lowe’s appellate victories have changed Texas criminal law. For example:

Court of Appeals of Texas ,

Corpus Christi-Edinburg.

(Name Redacted), Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas , Appellee.

No. 13-04-250-CV.

Aug. 4, 2005 .

On appeal from the 156th District Court of Bee County , Texas ; Joel B. Johnson , Judge.

Michael C. Lowe , Dallas, for appellant.

George P. Morrill II , Dist. Atty., Beeville, for state.

Before Chief Justice VALDEZ and Justices HINOJOSA and RODRIGUEZ .

OPINION

Opinion by Justice RODRIGUEZ .

Pursuant to Texas Government Code section 411.081 , the appellant petitioned the 156th Judicial District Court of Bee County , Texas , to seal his criminal record relating to a prior felony theft charge. SeeTex. Gov't Code Ann. § 411.081(d) (Vernon 2005). After a hearing, the trial judge denied appellant's petition. By two issues, appellant contends (1) the trial court erred by not conducting a hearing on the issue of whether it is in the best interest of justice to grant the petition, and (2) the evidence is insufficient to support the trial court's decision that it is not in the best interest of justice to grant his petition. We reverse and remand.

I. BACKGROUND

In 1980, appellant entered a plea of guilty or nolo contendere to the felony offense of theft and was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision. Ten years later, at the end of the period of supervision, the trial court dismissed the proceedings against appellant and discharged him from further community supervision. After waiting ten years, as mandated by statute, appellant filed a petition for non-disclosure in an attempt to prohibit criminal justice agencies from disclosing information related to his deferred adjudication. See id. A hearing was held on appellant's petition. The trial court denied the petition finding that such non-disclosure was not in the best interest of justice. This appeal ensued.

II. ANALYSIS

By his first issue, appellant argues the trial court erred by not conducting a hearing on the issue of whether it was in the best interest of justice to grant the petition.

Under section 411.081 of the government code , after a person files a petition for non-disclosure, the trial court is to conduct a hearing on (1) whether the person is entitled to file the petition and (2) whether issuance of the order is in the best interest of justice. Id. In this case, the trial court convened a hearing. However, at the hearing, the trial court heard only testimony addressing the issue of whether appellant met the statutory requirements *837 for filing his petition. [FN1]See id. The hearing did not address whether issuance of the order for non-disclosure would be in the best interest of justice. See id. We conclude that the trial court erred in making its ruling without addressing the issue of whether granting the order would be in the best interest of justice at the hearing. Appellant's first issue is sustained. [FN2]

FN1. After the hearing, the trial court found that all statutory requirements for review of the case were met.

FN2. Given our disposition of this issue, we need not address appellant's remaining issue. SeeTex.R.App. P. 47.1 .

III. CONCLUSION

Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the trial court and remand this case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 170 S.W.3d 836

Areas of Practice
      - 
Drugs
      -  DWI & DUI
      -  Assault
      -  Sex Crimes
      -  Appeals
      -  Felonies
      -  Misdemeanors
      -  Expunge Records
      -  and More

 

News & Events

"The Law and Cases on Appeal"

(Fri, 16 May 2008 05:47:48 GMT)
(Thu, 15 May 2008 10:26:48 GMT)
(Fri, 16 May 2008 21:46:58 GMT)
(Wed, 14 May 2008 22:50:33 GMT)
(Wed, 14 May 2008 21:18:19 GMT)
 
         

We are a Dallas criminal defense law firm. When it comes to your freedom and your reputation, “good enough” should not be an option. More

 

Dallas Justice – practice areas

Drugs, DWI, DUI, Assaults, Sex Crimes, Appeals, Bail, Felonies, Expunge Records Misdemeanors, Murder and more.

 
Dallas Justice – Resources

Do you need to find a statute? How about a law form, guideline or article? Let our law office and web site help you. More

 
Contact
 

Name

Tele

Email

Issue

 
 
Dallas Justice – Toll Free number
Defense HomeDallas Justice - Site SearchLegalLocation
 

State and Federal appeal - Defense Lawyer, Attorney and Law Firm - Dallas Justice - Dallas, Texas.

Dallas Criminal Defense Lawyer | Dallas Criminal Law Firm | Practice Areas | News & Events | Legal Resources
Dallas Bail Bonds | Location | Legal | Contact | My Blog | Lawyer Resources | Sitemap

Dallas Law Firm is a Texas, Dallas based criminal defense law firm practicing in the areas of Criminal Defense, DUI, DWI. Michael Lowe,
a board certified criminal defense lawyer is dedicated to representing clients accused, investigated or charged in state or federal criminal matters.

Law Offices of Michael Lowe:  700 N. Pearl Street – Suite 2170 – Dallas, Texas 75201  –   Tel: 214.526.1900  –  Toll Free: 866.351.1900

Dallas DWI Lawyer . Assault Lawyer . Sex Crimes Attorney . Appeals Lawyer . Felonies Attorney
Dallas Misdemeanors Lawyer . Texas DUI Attorney . Texas DWI Lawyer



© 2004–2006 – Law Offices of Michael Lowe  |  A PaperStreet Web Design